Builder can’t force Buyer to take possession in case of Delay
NCDRC ordered a Pune based builder – Marvel Omega to refund Rs 8.14 crores along with 10% annual interest to the buyer.
NCDRC ordered a Pune based builder – Marvel Omega to refund Rs 8.14 crores along with 10% annual interest to the buyer.
Chandigarh consumer commission coming to the rescue of the homebuyers has been able to restore its faith among homebuyers.
As compared to RERA in other states Karnataka RERA has been disappointing since the day it got enacted. Builders and homebuyers both remained unhappy for many reasons.
The manner of recovery of interest, penalty and compensation and the same is to be carried out in the manner provided in Karnataka Land Revenue Act 1967 and the rules made there under.
Don’t keep sleeping on your rights as homebuyers because the newly implemented RERA is here to empower you and before time runs out to go grab your rights.
The home buyers have multiple forums to their rescue and it depends on them as to under what procures and act or code they wish to proceed.
The Haryana government amends the Haryana Rera rules in order to bring the power of refund within the purview of Rera authority established at Panchkula and Gurgaon
Judgment, which is titled Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. upholds the constitutional validity of Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter as the ‘Code’).
Rajasthan RERA get into action at full swing as the appointment of the chairman, other officials and retired judges in the Appellate Tribunal is already done in May.
Homebuyer filed appeal before P & H High court against order Haryana RERA Tribunal which held that RERA authority does’t power to grant refund under RERA.
Not mentioning the date of giving possession to the buyer is a clear matter of fraud and misrepresentation and as per the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act of 1963.
RERA, has taken cognizance of the multiple ways by which consumers have been cheated in the past, and provided for solutions through their regulation mechanisms.
Since there are various difficulties in getting the order executed. At this point of time, the orders may be executed through RERA and also one can approach NCLT under IBC Law.
Centrik has tracked and been with RERA since its 1st day of implementation. During these 2 years of journey, we have resolved more than 6700 assignment relating to RERA and Insolvency laws on different issues.
Supreme Court allowed several buyers to join their suit property in order to increase valuation of their dispute and approach the NCDRC however buyers still find it difficult to get timely relief from the NCDRC.