The choice between ‘arbitration’ and ‘litigation’ is not one that can be made in a vacuum. Arbitration can and should be a flexible and efficient procedure for adjudicating disputes.
Author: Admin
Karnataka High Court orders for interim stay on the recovery of EMI from Homebuyers
The Karnataka High Court on 16.11.2021, allowed a deferment of all loan repayments, and directed the bank not to recovery the home loan and refrain from take any coercive action.
The Credit Information Companies and ‘Credit Score’
A credit history is considered as a record of a borrower’s repayment of debts. Being a record of the borrower’s credit history from numerous sources, including banks, credit card companies, collection agencies, and governments.
Limitation and Insolvency Laws (IBC)
The apex court held that the Code isn’t a machinery for recovery though its usage in several perspectives still be within the nature of a recovery system.
Debt without interest is also “Financial Debt” under IBC– Supreme Court
‘Financial Debt’ would have to be construed to include interest free loans advanced to finance the business operations of a corporate body.
Subvention Scheme: A Crisis for Homebuyers
A subvention scheme may end up to be a double-barreled if the developer fails to deliver the project on time, the burden of both rent and EMI will must be borne by the homebuyer.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2021
The Code was enacted in 2016 to consolidate and amend the laws governing corporate reorganization and insolvency resolution for corporations, partnerships, and individuals.
Recovery can be permitted against the assets of group companies: Bombay High Court
If the non-payment of a clear undisputed amount is being illegally and dishonestly avoided, whilst at the same time very large sums of money are being raised and spent by the same group or carrying on large real estate development projects.
Status of claims that do not form part of the Resolution Plan
Claims that do not form part of the resolution plan will be extinguished on the date of the adjudicating authority’s acceptance of the resolution plan. This ruling has reaffirmed the IBC’s goal, which is for the Corporate Debtor to start over with a clean slate based on the resolution plan.
CoC is empowered to consider revised financial offers keeping in mind the time limit set out by law: NCLAT
The NCLAT had to decide whether the NCLT/CoC may provide resolution applicants repeated chances to alter their individual resolution plans and whether the CoC was authorised to entertain fresh or revised resolution plans without exhausting available bids.
Prosecution u/s 138 of NI Act cannot be quashed on grounds of acceptance of CIRP: Madras HC
If the corporate debtor’s resolution plan was authorised and declared binding on the corporate debtor and its workers, members, creditors, guarantors, and other stakeholders under Section 31 of the Code, criminal proceedings under Section 138 will continue.
Petition can be admitted against maintenance company of developer: NCLAT
Section 5(8)(f) Explanation makes it clear that any amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project shall be deemed to be an amount having the commercial effect of a borrowing.
A Deficiency can be correct in Appeal: NCLAT
NCLAT said that if there was deficiency in pleading, the same could be corrected by giving opportunity before this Appellate Tribunal to amend the pleadings. In Appeal naturally pleadings could be by filing Application and reply supported by documents.
Adjudicating Authority is not required to order of Arbitration: NCLAT
The issue of existence of a dispute when the application under Section 9 of IBC is filed before the Adjudicating Authority. These actions raise doubt regarding the veracity of the dispute and its pre-existence.
Creditors can request for a transfer of the winding up proceedings to NCLT: Supreme Court
This judgement is a step in the right direction because it recognizes the authority of a non-petitioning creditor to request for a transfer of the winding up proceedings. It assures that A creditor is not deprived of their right just because they didn’t participate in the initial winding up procedure against corporate debtor.

join For Updates