Search Results for: register under RERA

Brief of Supreme Court’s Verdict on Amrapali Mess

A brief of verdict given by the Supreme Court on July 23, that the Amrapali Group has violated the doctrine of public trust by permitting diversion of funds of homebuyers.

What if the agreement does not mention the possession date?

Not mentioning the date of giving possession to the buyer is a clear matter of fraud and misrepresentation and as per the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act of 1963.

Registration of sale agreements are mandatory if homebuyers want interest

The UPRERA asked the builders to get their sale agreements registered, which will be necessary for the home buyers to seek interest in case of a delay in granting possession by a developer.

Penalty on builder as the terms of settlement was breached by the Builder

MahaRERA had setup a Conciliation Forum for aggrieved homebuyers who can approach the forum to get their grievances solved, before lodging complaints with the MahaRERA.

Builder cannot evade from penalty claiming the project to be new

The on-going projects cannot come under the category of the new projects only for the purposes of not paying the penalty against the delay in registering an on-going project.

Airoli developers to pay compensation to home buyers

Complaint filed against the developer Shahaji Javir for delaying the possession for a period of 9 long years of the flat booked in Nitin Enclave at Airoli in the month of June of year 2018.

Consumers want “No Stretch for Builders” in Delayed Projects

In protest against builders under the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) consumers established their own forum “Fight for RERA” comprising of homebuyers. The forum touts the RERA Authority not to grant stretch to builders who have already delayed their projects. The forum feels that any further stretch will violate the said RERA Rules. It was … Continue reading “Consumers want “No Stretch for Builders” in Delayed Projects”