Statutory Compliance under RERA Act, 2016
The provisions were not sufficient to render punishment to the developer and the builder for misconducting and breaching the terms and conditions of the builder buyer agreement in the long run.
The provisions were not sufficient to render punishment to the developer and the builder for misconducting and breaching the terms and conditions of the builder buyer agreement in the long run.
Kind of strong initiative by the authority gave a ray of hope to homebuyers as their rights are more protected now than ever. The authority is taking every possible step to avoid the violation of the provisions of the RERA Act and to protect the interest of the homebuyers.
According to RERA, grievances filed with the authority must be resolved within 60 days of filing. Complaints have been settled more quickly via the conciliation forum than through the authority. It also cuts down on the expense and time of litigation.
RERA registration is required for any real estate project that comes under the RERA Act’s scope. In this article, we take a closer look at the penalties for non-compliance under the RERA Act.
The main purpose of RERA was to enhance builder buyer transparency along with creating a strong adjudicating mechanism to resolve all the disputes in concern with the real estate sector.
The main purpose of the Act lies in enhancing the Transparency between buyer and builder and creating a strong adjudicating system for the disputes arising in real estate sector. An aggrieved homebuyer seeks right legal remedy after getting exploited by the builder.
Creditors who fails to the submit the claims with proof within 14 days can submit their claims within 90 days from the Insolvency Commencement date as per the amendment of Regulation 12(2).
A promoter should consider the future security of the buyers. Therefore, a promoter ought to give protected and right quality land administration to their expected clients.
The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs published a progress report of RERA cases on May, 1 2021 which accounts to 75% of the total disposed cases in the region of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Haryana.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision is a watershed moment for homebuyers and allottees. A number of findings in the current judgment support this conclusion, including parallel remedies under RERA and the Consumer Protection Act.
Brokers and agents will have to ensure that, they are properly registered with the regulator under RERA.
Once again the pandemic is hitting us hard in its second wave leaving no other option but to once again choose the path of virtual courts. So the decision of the RERA Authorities to go virtual is just to settle the disputes without any further delay and not to let the pandemic hamper our justice system.
UP-RERA has expressed contentions to issue a show-cause notice to Supertech Realtors under Section 5 (1) of the RERA Act, 2016 to describe why the application for registration should not be refused.
Main purpose of the Act lies in enhancing the Transparency between buyer and builder and creating a strong adjudicating system for the disputes arising in real estate sector.
Bihar-RERA issued an interim order in a case where it froze the bank accounts of a construction company and its directors.