IBC- Greatest rescue for the homebuyers
If there is no assured return plan incorporated into the builder buyer agreement entered into between the homebuyer and builder then the homebuyer had to approach RERA to seek refund.
If there is no assured return plan incorporated into the builder buyer agreement entered into between the homebuyer and builder then the homebuyer had to approach RERA to seek refund.
The shareholders and promoters are not the creditors and thereby the resolution plan cannot balance the maximization of the value of assets of the corporate debtor
The latest ordinance has brought about a lot of changes to the IBC giving relief to small stakeholders and homebuyers but this relief has caused delays in executing the process.
The IBC in section 29A bars promoters to take part in bidding process thus making them ineligible for representation in the committee of creditors.
The government could soon promulgate an ordinance to make changes to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code that will provide relief to small businesses and homebuyers
Both the IBC and RERA have the provisions where the probability for the conflict in their operations are very high.
When it comes to a detailed and again rather complicated legal framework of insolvency law under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016,(IBC) the key point is the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). This process is intended to assist firms that are in deficit and also to aid in avoiding being caught in the financial debt trap.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (for short “I&B Code”), enacted in 2016, marked a significant reform in India’s economic landscape by streamlining the insolvency resolution process and providing a balanced framework.
Interpreting the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 and sheds light on its significance in shaping the insolvency and bankruptcy landscape in India.
Asset attachment by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is critical in combating money laundering and criminal activities.
After the registration of the project if any defect comes into light which creates any problem in completion of the project, RERA Act provides remedy for the same.
The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Application and held that it is a case of collusive Application whereby the Corporate Debtor is trying to seek benefits of Moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC and other advantages in accordance with other provisions of IBC 2016.
CA. Venkata Siva Kumar, the petitioner, is a chartered accountant who has registered as an IP with the IBBI. In his writ petition, he claimed that the IBBI Regulations, 2016 are in violation of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution and should be overturned.
IBC is economic legislation and that when it comes to economic legislation, flexibility should be given to the legislature because no economic law can be fool proof at its inception.
The NCLT Kolkata Bench imposed a mandatory condition on all the financial creditors to file information of their record of default with the National E-Governance Services Ltd. (NESL).