Currently set to Index
Currently set to Follow
Skip to content
  • +91 - 844-848 7142 | +91 - 011-4607 4008
  • support@centrik.in
Login / Register
Centrik
MENUMENU
  • FAQ for Homebuyers
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Team
  • SERVICES
    • Government Advisory
      • Grievance Redressal
      • Government License
      • Project Funding
    • Legal Advisory
      • Authentic Legal Advice
      • Legal Outsourcing
      • Corporate Litigation- All In Way
    • Tax Advisory
      • All About GST
      • Tax Planning
      • Tax Litigation
      • Tax Refund
    • Business Advisory
      • All For Startup
      • CCM
      • Registration And Compliance
    • Cross Border Advisory
      • Go Global
      • Invest In India
  • RERA
    • What is RERA?
    • RERA for Developers
    • RERA Complaints
    • RERA Litigation
    • RERA CASE LAWS
    • State-Wise RERA
  • IBC (NCLT) & DEBT
    • What is IBC & NCLT ?
    • What is Debt Recovery?
    • IBC for Creditors
    • IBC for Homebuyers
    • IBC for Corporate Debtor
    • Initiation of Insolvency Process?
    • Become a Resolution Applicant
    • Engagement Model
    • Why choose us?
  • RESOURCES
    • Blogs
    • Updates
    • We Are Hiring
  • CONTACT US
Submit Free Query

Blogs - Legal Advisory Archives - Page 15 of 48 - Centrik

CentrikBlogsLegal Advisory

Category: Legal Advisory

SC imposes a penalty of ₹5 Lakhs on the petitioner seeking an alternative to Supertech Twin Towers Demolition

Posted by khyatikhemkaPosted on August 11, 2022August 14, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Legal Advisory, Registration And Compliance, RERA ConsultingTags case of Public Interest Litigation, Noida Supertech twin towers, penalty on petitioner, Petition under Article 32, supertech twin tower case, supertech twin tower judgement, Supertech Twin Towers Demolition, Supreme Court Judgement on Supertech Twin Towers Demolition, Supreme court latest decision on supertch twin towers, Why twin towers in Noida being demolished?

SC Imposes penalty of Rs.5 lakhs and directed the same to be deposited within 4 days to the SC registry. The amount will be transferred to Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) to be used for the welfare of families affected by Covid.

0
Read More

The Corporate Guarantor can initiate CIRP against the Corporate Debtor under “Right to subvention”

Posted by Adv. Niraj ChamyalPosted on August 10, 2022August 13, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags Corporate Debtor under Right to subvention, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, file a petition against the Corporate Debtor, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Orbit Towers Vs Sampurna Suppliers, Proceeding against the Corporate Debtor, recovery of the dues, rights of the Creditor

Proceeding against the Corporate Debtor for the recovery of the dues and hence can file a petition against the Corporate Debtor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before the Adjudicating Authority.

0
Read More

Supreme Court’s Road Map to interpret The IBC Code for better Resolution

Posted by AdminPosted on August 9, 2022August 13, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016, Legal AdvisoryTags Asset Reconstruction Company vs Tulip Star Hotels, challenges of IBC, corporate debtor, corporate insolvency resolution process steps, current issues in insolvency law, Financial Creditor, non-performing asset, Provisions of IBC, what is insolvency resolution process

Hon’ble Supreme court declared that the provisions of IBC (Code) to be interpreted liberally to expand the objective of the Statute.

0
Read More

Debts incurred during CIRP are also a part of IRP costs, says NCLAT

Posted by khyatikhemkaPosted on August 8, 2022August 13, 20220 CommentsCategories Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags CIRP against Corporate Debtor, CIRP Cost under IBC, CIRP proceedings, conditional resolution plan, corporate insolvency resolution process, insolvency resolution process costs, latest supreme court judgement on nclt, non implementation of resolution plan, Supreme Court Judgement on IBC

the Resolution Plan in question is in violation of section 30(2) (a) of the IBC. The NCLAT subsequently modified the Resolution Plan to include this claim in accordance with the law.

0
Read More

Is Adjudicating Authority under obligation to accept an application against a Corporate Debtor u/s 7?

Posted by shravyapathakPosted on July 27, 2022August 29, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags applicant under section 7 of IBC, application against a Corporate Debtor, CIRP against the Appellant, corporate debtor, corporate debtor under IBC, file application under NCLT, filed an appeal before APTEL, financial creditor as resolution applicant, initiation of CIRP by operational creditor, issue before the Supreme Court, procedure of filing in NCLT, section 7 IBC procedure, section 7 of IBC case laws

The Adjudicating Authorities have been given discretionary powers under section 7(5)(a) of I&B Code, 2016. The Authorities are required to apply their mind and take into consideration all facts and circumstances.

0
Read More

IBC Pecuniary Threshold: – Interest Component to Be Merged with Principal Debt?

Posted by AdminPosted on July 25, 2022July 30, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags CIRP against Corporate Debtor, CIRP process initiated against the corporate debtor, Component of EMI, corporate debtor, date of default under IBC, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Interest Component, interest on delayed payment, NCLAT latest Judgement, Pavan Enterprises vs. Gammon India, right to claim under IBC, threshold limit under IBC, What is principal and interest on debt?, What is the interest component?

The interest component can include in the principal debt to acquire a minimum threshold limit i.e., 1 crore if delayed payment stipulated in the agreement or invoice.

0
Read More

Is the Principle of Natural Justice applicable to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016? 

Posted by AdminPosted on July 22, 2022July 25, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016, Registration And ComplianceTags CIRP of the Corporate Debtor, insolvency against government company, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, latest supreme court judgement on insolvency, NCLT order on Natural Justice, principles of natural justice, Revised Resolution Plan before the CoC, SC judgement on IBC

The actions of the CoC by not accepting the Applicant’s Resolution Plan were void in nature and held that the Applicant must be given a fresh opportunity to participate in the process of submission of the Resolution Plan.

0
Read More

Hon’ble NCLAT declares claim of the license fee will be covered under the ambit of IBC

Posted by AdminPosted on July 18, 2022July 25, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags appeal against NCLAT order, appeal from nclat to supreme court, financial debt under IBC, latest supreme court judgement on insolvency, list of companies admitted in nclt, Operational Debt under IBC, rent is not an operational debt

Claim of the rental lease will be treated as operational debt under Section 5(21) of the code as per the decision given by the Hon’ble NCLAT.

0
Read More

Land Allotment Cancellation over Non-Payment of Dues, Red Alert for the Developers

Posted by Sidra Khalid KhanPosted on June 19, 2022June 21, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Registration And Compliance, RERA ConsultingTags Ajnara loses land over non-payment of dues, Ajnara Realtech loses Greater Noida land, Land Allotment Cancellation, Land Allotment is cancelled, Land allotment to Ajnara Realtech cancelled, Non-Payment of Dues

the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority had cancelled the allotment of ‘Panorama’ in Sector 22A over non-payment of dues of Rs 46.8 crore.

0
Read More

Consumer court have the power to direct refund and compensation in case of delayed delivery of the apartment

Posted by KrishnapriyaPosted on June 16, 2022June 21, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016, Registration And ComplianceTags case of a dispute home buyers, consumer dispute, Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Protection Act and the RERA Act, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Legal remedies available for Home Buyers, National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, RERA Complaint

The Consumer Protection Act is a wide-ranging provision and it is not a specific resolution like the Insolvency ad Bankruptcy Code and the remedies are simultaneously and mutually exclusive.

0
Read More

Article 1 of the Limitation Act, is not applicable to proceedings under the IBC Laws

Posted by KrishnapriyaPosted on June 15, 2022June 21, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags applicability of limitation act to ibc, CIRP procedure against the Corporate Debtor, corporate insolvency resolution proceedings, Limitation Act, Limitation Act under IBC, Limitation is application to IBC, Limitation under IBC, proceedings under IBC Laws, proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, time-barred debt under limitation act

Article 137 is having a wider scope than Article 1 of the Limitation Act and is not applicable to the proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Article 1 is also not applicable to the petition filed by the Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

0
Read More

Whether the Wages/Salaries during the CIRP Period are to be qualified as CIRP Costs or not

Posted by Advocate Chetna BishtPosted on June 14, 2022June 23, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags CIRP under IBC, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, insolvency resolution process costs, Insolvency under IBC, liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, liquidation process, petition under section 7 of IBC, salaries to be included in the CIRP costs

Wages and salaries are considered and included in CIRP costs as per under Section 53(1)(a) of the IB Code.

0
Read More

Whether CIRP against Corporate Guarantor be initiated in respect of loan account of the principal borrower

Posted by KrishnapriyaPosted on June 11, 2022June 21, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags CIRP against Corporate Guarantor, corporate guarantor under ibc, Financial Creditor under IBC, guarantor liability ibc, insolvency of guarantor, personal guarantors liable for corporate debt, proceedings under IBC, Recovery of Debts, supreme court judgement in favour of guarantor

Section 7 of the Code permits a financial creditor to initiate a CIRP procedure against the guarantor being a corporate debtor in accordance with the default committed by the principal borrower.

0
Read More

Trademark Registration and Protection against its Infringement

Posted by Amit_krPosted on June 5, 2022June 5, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Legal Advisory, Registration And ComplianceTags administrative remedies for infringement of trademark, Infringement of Trade Mark, infringement of trademark cases in india, legal action against the infringer, remedies for infringement of trademark, remedies for unregistered trademarks, Right of Trademark Holder, Trademark infringement, Trademark Registration, types of trademark infringement

The trademark is Intellectual property and every property must be registered in the name of its owner, and here the brand name is Intellectual property of the owner which comes from the intellect of the owner.

0
Read More

Limitation is continuous in cases of Homebuyers

Posted by Adv. Asmita Chaudhary NagpalPosted on June 4, 2022June 5, 20220 CommentsCategories Authentic Legal Advice, Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Grievance Redressal, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016, Registration And Compliance, RERA ConsultingTags Builder-Buyer Agreement, case of homebuyers, continuous cause of action consumer protection act, corporate insolvency resolution process, Grievances of the Homebuyers, home-buyers as financial creditors, homebuyers and builders, homebuyers in the CIRP, Homebuyers under IBC, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, possession is handed over to the homebuyer, RERA judgements in favour of builders, rights of homebuyers under ibc

If a homebuyer failed to file his/her case then will his/her case will not be taken and his grievances won’t be solved? The answer to this question is “NO”! The reason here is that the limitation period in the case of a homebuyer is continuous in view of the non-handing over of the possession of the unit.

0
Read More

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 … Page 48 Next page
Loading

Blogs

  • All About GST
  • All For Startup
  • Authentic Legal Advice
  • Benchmarking
  • Business Advisory
  • Corporate Litigation-All In Way
  • Cross Border Advisory
  • Debt Recovery Management
  • Go Global
  • Government Advisory
  • Grievance Redressal
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016
  • Invest In India
  • Legal Advisory
  • Legal Outsourcing
  • Project Funding
  • Registration And Compliance
  • RERA Consulting
  • Tax Advisory
  • Tax Litigation
  • Tax Planning
  • Tax Refund
  • Tender Servicing
  • Uncategorized

centrik-small
CentrikTM is a team of highly experienced professionals and advisors including bureaucrats, ex-government officials, advocates, bankers and other experts who provide key consulting, government liaisoning and advisory services, under one roof.

Read More

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Our Experts
  • Become An Expert
  • Updates
  • Blogs
  • Submit Query
  • Subscribe To Newsletter

Latest Blogs

  • TRANSFER PRICING IN INDIA: REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, KEY PRINCIPLES AND EMERGING TRENDS August 20, 2024
  • Discretion vs. Mandatory Admission: Future of Section 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 August 14, 2024
  • NCLT Rejects Merger Scheme on Grounds of Public Interest August 13, 2024
  • ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS IN INDIA: LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLICATIONS August 12, 2024
  • Applicability of Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Foreign Seated Arbitrations August 8, 2024

Terms

  • Disclaimers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Call Us

+91 - 011 4607 4008
+91 - 844 848 7142

Address

E-11 Basement, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi- 110014

Email

support@centrik.in

Copyright ©2016-17 Centrik. All Rights Reserved

Submit Your Query

Get Started

Create New Query

WhatsApp join For Updates