Skip to content
  • +91 - 844-848 7142 | +91 - 011-4607 4008
  • support@centrik.in
Login / Register
Centrik
MENUMENU
  • FAQ for Homebuyers
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Team
  • SERVICES
    • Government Advisory
      • Grievance Redressal
      • Government License
      • Project Funding
    • Legal Advisory
      • Authentic Legal Advice
      • Legal Outsourcing
      • Corporate Litigation- All In Way
    • Tax Advisory
      • All About GST
      • Tax Planning
      • Tax Litigation
      • Tax Refund
    • Business Advisory
      • All For Startup
      • CCM
      • Registration And Compliance
    • Cross Border Advisory
      • Go Global
      • Invest In India
  • RERA
    • What is RERA?
    • RERA for Developers
    • RERA Complaints
    • RERA Litigation
    • RERA CASE LAWS
    • State-Wise RERA
  • IBC (NCLT) & DEBT
    • What is IBC & NCLT ?
    • What is Debt Recovery?
    • IBC for Creditors
    • IBC for Homebuyers
    • IBC for Corporate Debtor
    • Initiation of Insolvency Process?
    • Become a Resolution Applicant
    • Engagement Model
    • Why choose us?
  • RESOURCES
    • Blogs
    • Updates
    • We Are Hiring
  • CONTACT US
Submit Free Query

Blogs

CentrikBlogs

Corporate Debtor cannot be blamed for delay in delivery of possession when delay occurs due to Force Majeure

Posted by Shriya.mehtaPosted on March 10, 2020March 12, 20200 CommentsCategories Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags Corporate Debtor cannot be blamed for delay in delivery of possession, Corporate Debtor defaulted in delivering the possession, corporate debtor under IBC, Corporate Debtor under NCLT, delay in delivering possession is due to the Corporate Debtor, Developer failed to deliver the possession, Financial Creditor terminated the Agreement, proposed time for handing over the possession, Recovery of Money, refund of the total amount, Who is Corporate Debtor

Whether the delay in delivering possession is due to the Corporate Debtor & in case the delay is not due to the Corporate Debtor, but force majeure, it cannot be alleged that the Corporate Debtor has defaulted in delivering the possession.

0
Read More

Interest for Delayed Period of Possession to be calculated from date of default of Handing over Possession

Posted by Shriya.mehtaPosted on March 7, 2020April 17, 20233 Comments on Interest for Delayed Period of Possession to be calculated from date of default of Handing over PossessionCategories RERA ConsultingTags Allottee can claim recovery of interest of delayed period of possession, complaint against promotor before MahaRERA, delay in handing over the possession, Delay in Possession, possession is handed over to allottee, promoter failed to hand over possession of flat, promotor agreed to hand over possession of flat, recovery of interest of delayed period of possession, registered agreement for sale

The promoter is under obligation to pay interest on the amount paid by allottee from the date of payment till the possession is handed over to allottee.

3 Comments on Interest for Delayed Period of Possession to be calculated from date of default of Handing over Possession
Read More

No bar to Initiate Insolvency Proceedings pendency the action under SARFAESI Act or RDBFI Act

Posted by Shriya.mehtaPosted on March 6, 20200 CommentsCategories Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags corporate debtor under IBC, Initiate Insolvency Proceedings pendency, Insolvency Proceedings pendency the action under SARFAESI Act, proceeding under Recovery of Debts, provisions of Moratorium, Recovery of Debts, Recovery proceedings, resolution process of corporate debtor

The pendency of actions under the SARFAESI Act or actions under the RDDBFI Act, 1993 does not create an obstruction for applying Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, especially given Section 238 of IBC.

0
Read More

MREAT allowed delay of 14 months and 22 days to allottees

Posted by Shriya.mehtaPosted on March 5, 20200 CommentsCategories RERA ConsultingTags complaint before MahaRERA, delay in filing an appeal, execute and register agreements for sale, filing of an application for non-compliance of the order before MahaRERA, MREAT allowed delay, no date of handing over possession, order passed by MahaRERA

In the matter of Mr. Anil Mnagaldas Vade & ors. vs. Siddhitech Developers, the delay in filing an appeal u/s 44 of RERA Act, MREAT allowed delay of 14 months & 22 days to homebuyers.

0
Read More

Claim amount towards interest on loan alone cannot be termed as Operational Debt

Posted by Shriya.mehtaPosted on February 29, 20200 CommentsCategories Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags Best Insolvency Professionals in Mumbai, Claim amount of interest on loan, File an appeal to NCLT, initiate CIRP against the corporate debtor, Insolvency Professionals in Mumbai, interest on delayed payment, NCLT Bench Mumbai, NCLT Mumbai, operation debtor under IBC, Operational debt under IBC in India, rejected petition under NCLT Bench

A pre-existing dispute towards interest on the delayed payments before the issuance of the demand notice and that the alleged claim amount towards interest on loan alone, cannot be termed as an “Operational Debt”.

0
Read More

MREAT directed developers to refund the Forfeited Amount

Posted by Shriya.mehtaPosted on February 28, 2020February 29, 20200 CommentsCategories RERA ConsultingTags Best RERA lawyers in Mumbai, directed developers to refund amount, file a complaint under MahaRERA for recovery, legal notice to the developers for recover money, Maharashtra RERA, order passed by MahaRERA, order to refund the amount, RERA in Maharashtra

MREAT directed the developers to refund the forfeited amount of Rs. 8.14 lakhs to Jagdish Patel and Pravin Patel within two months.

0
Read More

Builders are demanding cash despite RERA and Demonetization

Posted by akshaydhawanPosted on February 25, 2020February 26, 20200 CommentsCategories RERA ConsultingTags builders and homebuyers, Builders demanding cash, Indian Real Estate Sector, issues between builders and homebuyers, Maharashtra RERA, pay cash to builders, RERA and Demonetization

Builders demanding cash are often a sign of unscrupulous dealings and should not invest their hard earnings in such dicey investments.

0
Read More

Employee Benefits Constitute Operational Debt

Posted by shubham chhaleriyaPosted on February 24, 2020February 26, 20200 CommentsCategories Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags Corporate Insolvency Process against the Corporate Debtor, Employee Benefits Constitute Operational Debt, Insolvency Professionals in Bengaluru, Legal Experts in Bengaluru, non-payment of pending salary, Notice issued to the Operational Creditor, objections raised by the Corporate Debtor, pending cases against the Corporate Debtors, recovery of dues under NCLT, Salary Benefits Constitute Operational Debt

A claim was made in respect of the non-payment of pending salary and other settlement benefits such as leave encashment, Leave Travel Allowance, and bonus.

0
Read More

New IBC Amendments in work likely to benefit creditors in cases of Cross Border Insolvency

Posted by Priyanshi JaiswalPosted on February 23, 20200 CommentsCategories Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags Agreements to resolve insolvency proceedings, benefits to creditors in Cross Border Insolvency cases, cases of Cross Border Insolvency, corporate debtor under IBC, Corporate Debtor under IBC in India, cross border insolvency processes, Insolvency laws, insolvency proceedings, New IBC Amendments, what is cross border insolvency proceeding?

The IBBI has disclosed that work is in progress to amend the IBC to make it compliant with cross border insolvency processes.

0
Read More

Insolvency plea cannot reject if the dispute is raised on telephonic communication: Allahabad NCLT

Posted by ShriyamehtaPosted on February 22, 2020February 23, 20200 CommentsCategories Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags a petition filed by corporate debtor for initiation of CIRP, a petition filed by corporate debtor for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Allahabad NCLT, application of initiation of the CIRP, claim for notice of dispute, dispute before the tribunal, dispute on corporate debtor, Insolvency plea rejected, notice of dispute, notice of dispute under IBC, Operational Creditor filed a petition

A notice of dispute to a claim under the IBC (Section 9), 2016 is not admissible if made over a telephonic communication and not supported by phone records. 

0
Read More

Homebuyers approach parliamentary committee against ordinance infringing their rights to approach NCLT

Posted by AdminPosted on February 21, 2020February 21, 20200 CommentsCategories RERA ConsultingTags cases pending before the NCLT, corporate insolvency process, Homebuyers can approach NCLT, Homebuyers Financial Creditors, proceedings under IBC against Builder, proceedings under the IBC, remedies available for homebuyers against errant builders, remedies under Consumer Protection Act, Remedies under RERA, rights of Homebuyers as Financial Creditors, rights to approach NCLT

Forum for People’s Collective Efforts, has approached the parliamentary standing committee on finance with its objection to a proposed amendment to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

0
Read More

Does amount advanced as loan without proper proofs/documentations constitute a Financial Debt?

Posted by ShriyamehtaPosted on February 20, 2020February 21, 20200 CommentsCategories Corporate Litigation-All In Way, Debt Recovery Management, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags claim rejected by resolution professional, definition of the financial debt, definition of the financial debt under IBC, documentations constitute a Financial Debt, filed the application before NCLT, Financial debt, financial debt under IBC, issues before NCLT, NCLT Delhi Bench, resolution professional

The matter is that in a situation where the Applicant is unable to prove the amount advanced as loan without proper documentations, such loan amount would not meet the requirements of a “Financial Debt”. 

0
Read More

Kerala Comes under the Umbrella of RERA

Posted by Adv. Shanu LambaPosted on February 18, 2020February 20, 20200 CommentsCategories RERA ConsultingTags awareness programmes on RERA in Kerala, Best Legal Consultancy, implementation of RERA in Kerala, Kerala RERA, Kerala RERA decisions, Kerala RERA Rules, Kerala RERA rules for Registration, Registration under Kerala RERA, RERA authority in Kerala, RERA in Kerala, RERA Lawyers in Kerala, right of the homebuyers under Kerala RERA

Kerala RERA was formally launched on January 1, 2020. The Authority has also fixed a three-month period for developers to register all ongoing and upcoming projects.

0
Read More

Claims towards the lease of immovable property do not fall within the definition of Operational Debt under IBC

Posted by ShriyamehtaPosted on February 17, 2020February 20, 20200 CommentsCategories Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags application before the NCLT, definition of Operational Debt under IBC, insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor, issues before the NCLAT, lease of immovable property, Operational Debt under IBC, operational debt under IBC india

NCLAT, New Delhi Bench has held that claims towards rent of leasehold property do not fall within the definition of the operational debt under IBC.

0
Read More

How Operational Creditors can revive their time-barred debt: An analysis of the Mekko Steel Case

Posted by Amar VivekPosted on February 15, 2020February 19, 20200 CommentsCategories Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016Tags application of the Limitation Act, bankruptcy, Debt from the Operational Creditor, debt recovery matters, how operational creditors can revive debt, IBC, insolvency, operational creditor under ibc, procedure to revive debts, remedy to revive time-barred debt, revival of debt for initiating CIRP, time-barred debts

There is a certainty that the time-barred debt can be revived even after the lapse of an initial period of limitation which is 3 years.

0
Read More

Posts navigation

Previous Page 1 … Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 … Page 101 Next
Loading

Blogs

  • All About GST
  • All For Startup
  • Authentic Legal Advice
  • Benchmarking
  • Business Advisory
  • Corporate Litigation-All In Way
  • Cross Border Advisory
  • Debt Recovery Management
  • Go Global
  • Government Advisory
  • Grievance Redressal
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016
  • Invest In India
  • Legal Advisory
  • Legal Outsourcing
  • Project Funding
  • Registration And Compliance
  • RERA Consulting
  • Tax Advisory
  • Tax Litigation
  • Tax Planning
  • Tax Refund
  • Tender Servicing
  • Uncategorized

centrik-small
CentrikTM is a team of highly experienced professionals and advisors including bureaucrats, ex-government officials, advocates, bankers and other experts who provide key consulting, government liaisoning and advisory services, under one roof.

Read More

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Our Experts
  • Become An Expert
  • Updates
  • Blogs
  • Submit Query
  • Subscribe To Newsletter

Latest Blogs

  • TRANSFER PRICING IN INDIA: REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, KEY PRINCIPLES AND EMERGING TRENDS August 20, 2024
  • Discretion vs. Mandatory Admission: Future of Section 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 August 14, 2024
  • NCLT Rejects Merger Scheme on Grounds of Public Interest August 13, 2024
  • ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS IN INDIA: LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLICATIONS August 12, 2024
  • Applicability of Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Foreign Seated Arbitrations August 8, 2024

Terms

  • Disclaimers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Call Us

+91 - 011 4607 4008
+91 - 844 848 7142

Address

E-11 Basement, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi- 110014

Email

support@centrik.in

Copyright ©2016-17 Centrik. All Rights Reserved

Submit Your Query

Get Started

Create New Query

WhatsApp join For Updates