Builders not liable to pay for ‘justified’ delays: MahaRERA

MUMBAI: The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority has for the first time expanded the scope of reasons beyond a builder’s control. The authority upheld a city builder’s claim that a 2009 project was delayed due to change of law, administrative conflicts and “incorrect classification of the plot as CRZ II’’ —reasons beyond his control. Hence, the builder … Continue reading “Builders not liable to pay for ‘justified’ delays: MahaRERA”

“Possession can’t be delayed again and again for homebuyers” NCDRC

The possession of flats booked by homebuyers can’t be delayed. The apex consumer commission has said as it asked a private builder to refund the amount paid by its customers. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) pointed that possession was not given to homebuyers even after 5 years and asked New Delhi-based Adel Landmarks Limited … Continue reading ““Possession can’t be delayed again and again for homebuyers” NCDRC”

System can’t be Blamed by Builders for delay in Delivery

Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) alleged that builders cannot blame the system to seek exemption from paying rectification to homebuyers for the delay in completion of projects. The regulator has authorized that the developer is not entitled to recover any money from allottees without approvals of the competent authority. With this, MahaRERA has re-established … Continue reading “System can’t be Blamed by Builders for delay in Delivery”

Consumers want “No Stretch for Builders” in Delayed Projects

In protest against builders under the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) consumers established their own forum “Fight for RERA” comprising of homebuyers. The forum touts the RERA Authority not to grant stretch to builders who have already delayed their projects. The forum feels that any further stretch will violate the said RERA Rules. It was … Continue reading “Consumers want “No Stretch for Builders” in Delayed Projects”

Karnataka real estate industry concerned at RERA penal provision for delays

MANGALURU, NOVEMBER 10:   Real estate sector has expressed concern over the penal provisions in the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act in case of project delays, even for reasons beyond builders’ control. Addressing a workshop organised by Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority, DB Mehta, president of the Mangaluru chapter of Credai (Confederation of Real … Continue reading “Karnataka real estate industry concerned at RERA penal provision for delays”

Treatment and Priority of EPFO dues under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”)

The provisions Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 specifically provides for treatment for all sums due to any workman or employee from the provident fund, the pension fund and the gratuity fund. Further, in the present scenario there is much debate on the admissibility of the claim of EPFO under Sections 7Q and 14B for which … Continue reading “Treatment and Priority of EPFO dues under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”)”

Navigating the Evolving Landscape of RERA Laws: A Present Perspective

In recent years, Real Estate Regulatory Authorities (RERAs) have emerged as key players in shaping the real estate sector, ensuring transparency, accountability, and protecting the rights of homebuyers. Real Estate Regulatory Authorities were established to regulate and promote the real estate sector, with the primary objective of safeguarding the interests of homebuyers and promoting fair practices within the industry.